An Economic Case For Public Art

The argument is all-too familiar – public art is nice but we don't need it and we can't afford it. The Atlantic Cities rebutts this claim with specific examples of how public art has contributed to a community's bottom line. Excerpt: "The intangible benefits of public art—aesthetic beauty, cultural interpretation, education, inspiration, and general improvement of the urban environment—are well-known. But because these are considered "soft" benefits, they are sometimes dismissed as a low priority, especially during challenging economic times. However, experiences in Los Angeles show that public art can be a source of publicity and cash income, as well as beauty." Read the rest here.

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

The argument is all-too familiar – public art is nice but we don’t need it and we can’t afford it. The Atlantic Cities rebutts this claim with specific examples of how public art has contributed to a community’s bottom line.

Excerpt:

“The intangible benefits of public art—aesthetic beauty, cultural interpretation, education, inspiration, and general improvement of the urban environment—are well-known. But because these are considered “soft” benefits, they are sometimes dismissed as a low priority, especially during challenging economic times. However, experiences in Los Angeles show that public art can be a source of publicity and cash income, as well as beauty.”

Read the rest here.

Author

Our Partners

City of Oak Park

Common Ground Is Brewing

Support local stories and receive our signature roast straight to your door when you join at the Standard level (or above).

Drink Better, Read Local

Close the CTA

Don't miss out!

Everything Detroit, in your inbox every week.

Close the CTA

Already a subscriber? Enter your email to hide this popup in the future.